
- ACDSEE PRO 10 BEST WAY TO BACK UP KEYWORDS CATAGORIES HOW TO
- ACDSEE PRO 10 BEST WAY TO BACK UP KEYWORDS CATAGORIES SOFTWARE
Which would be consistent with my understanding of how ACDSee configures (Which could be wrong, of course) their database. If you are interested in learning more, look up hierarchical databases on the internet. Sorry I got a little "wonky" on you guys, I try to keep that in check, and I did really present an extremely simplified version, so the issue is far more nuanced than I have presented here. If you know that you will always want to know all the groups a given photo is in, use categories. Use collections when the membership is volatile and always changing.

The big problem of course that Emil pointed out is, you need to examine every collection to see what collections a given photo is in.So, I would say use categories when you know the structure is long term and unlikely to change. And if the collection is no longer needed, that collection file can be quickly deleted or renamed with no problem. This way, the collections can be created and deleted at will, and when someone wants to look at a specific photo in a collection, ACDSee can look at the photo's name and look it up in that first main photo record file VERY quickly. it isn't something you want to do willy nilly, ESPECIALLY to this file which is the heart of the entire ACDSee management system.However, for Collections, which are designed to be a sort of 'ad hoc' membership, where photos could be added or removed at will and possibly with more frequency than the more rigid categories would be comfortable with, It would be better to create a separate hierarchy file that looks like this: Of course the metadata can be changed, ACDSee does it all the time, But frequent changes and changes and additions to that metadata infrastructure can make the photo records VERY large and cause all sorts of problems that will require frequent database maintenance. The problem with this is, it is buried in the body of the photo record itself, which makes changing metadata a slow thing (in computer terms, not people terms) and something that the programmers want to check out and test very carefully. The metadata hangs off of the photo entry itself, so access to metadata is VERY fast, and one can quickly identify all the categories that a given photo is a part of.

This is an instance where Categories might be more useful for you. This is a very 'rigid' way to store that sort of information since collections are sort of meant to be fast and flexible, and maybe even temporary, and storing collection membership inside the metadata is not a fast and flexible way to store stuff that can change rapidly. To know which collections a given photo is in, it would require that the collection membership information be stored in the photo's metadata.
ACDSEE PRO 10 BEST WAY TO BACK UP KEYWORDS CATAGORIES HOW TO
I'm finding collections quite useful for avoiding metadata Do you have an idea, how to display all assigned collections of an image (or a set of images) if the tree of collections is several levels deep and has hundreds of defined collections? I need to see this at a glance.Īfaik the collections tab won't show any existing assignments at all, and the collections part of the organize tab must be be completely unfolded to show all assignments.Sorry, I do not. Both are there, and available for your use. In this way, you can create short term groupings, or groupings that would normally clutter up your metadata with one time use categories. But a picture of Aunt Tilley taken at Christmas time, and a photo of the Christmas Ham or Turkey, might not fall in the same category but still both are still Christmas photos.

A photo of Aunt Tilley will always be a photo of a person. A category is metadata and a category entry is stored in the DB for each photo.Īs near as I can tell (ACDSee doesn't talk a lot about database configuration, and we have to figure things out on our own!), Collections exist outside the metadata structure of individual photos, and as such have a slightly different view of permanence and allows us to create collections that might include a variety of categories, yet still have some relation to each other.įor instance, we might create categories of People, places, and things. However there are some subtle differences. In practical terms, there isn't a LOT of difference between collections and categories, they both group things together.
ACDSEE PRO 10 BEST WAY TO BACK UP KEYWORDS CATAGORIES SOFTWARE
No they are available in all three ACDSee photo management software titles (ACDSee 19, ACDSee Pro 9, and ACDSee Ultimate 9).
